The Uptime report

Uptime Report Research · State Atlas

Data Centers by State: Virginia Holds 1 in 5 Mapped Sites, and Its Commercial Power Use Jumped 60% Since 2019

Data centers by state, counted from public data: Virginia has 239 of the 1,207 data center sites mapped in the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s Open Source Data Center Atlas, about 1 in 5, followed by Texas (117) and California (109). Virginia’s commercial electricity sales rose 60% from 2019 to 2025, against 10% nationally (EIA).

239Virginia: mapped data center sites
117Texas: mapped data center sites
109California: mapped data center sites
97Oregon: mapped data center sites
74Ohio: mapped data center sites

There is no official government count of data centers by state, and private trackers each use their own definitions. We combined three public sources and kept their numbers separate, because they measure different things:

Mapped data center sitesFacilities in PNNL’s atlas, built from OpenStreetMap. We merged overlapping layers so a campus and the buildings inside it count once. Crowd-sourced, so it undercounts.
NAICS 518210 establishmentsCensus County Business Patterns locations of hosting, data processing, and computing infrastructure businesses, including offices. Not buildings.
Commercial electricity salesEIA retail sales to the commercial sector, where EIA has tied recent growth to data centers and other large computing facilities. Includes every office, store, and school too.

Map: mapped data center sites by state

Data center sites in the PNNL Open Source Data Center Atlas, by state

Alaska: 0 mapped data center sites; 33 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)AK0Maine: 2 mapped data center sites; 64 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)ME2Wisconsin: 13 mapped data center sites; 186 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)WI13Vermont: 0 mapped data center sites; 41 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)VT0New Hampshire: 3 mapped data center sites; 94 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NH3Washington: 52 mapped data center sites; 476 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)WA52Idaho: 3 mapped data center sites; 108 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)ID3Montana: 2 mapped data center sites; 58 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MT2North Dakota: 2 mapped data center sites; 32 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)ND2Minnesota: 9 mapped data center sites; 291 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MN9Illinois: 44 mapped data center sites; 627 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)IL44Michigan: 10 mapped data center sites; 455 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MI10New York: 20 mapped data center sites; 1,013 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NY20Massachusetts: 3 mapped data center sites; 510 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MA3Oregon: 97 mapped data center sites; 231 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)OR97Nevada: 36 mapped data center sites; 204 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NV36Wyoming: 6 mapped data center sites; 59 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)WY6South Dakota: 2 mapped data center sites; 53 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)SD2Iowa: 39 mapped data center sites; 126 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)IA39Indiana: 5 mapped data center sites; 258 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)IN5Ohio: 74 mapped data center sites; 633 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)OH74Pennsylvania: 9 mapped data center sites; 937 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)PA9Connecticut: 5 mapped data center sites; 211 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)CT5Rhode Island: 0 mapped data center sites; 46 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)RI0California: 109 mapped data center sites; 2,698 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)CA109Utah: 10 mapped data center sites; 268 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)UT10Colorado: 20 mapped data center sites; 554 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)CO20Nebraska: 18 mapped data center sites; 124 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NE18Missouri: 13 mapped data center sites; 265 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MO13Kentucky: 5 mapped data center sites; 441 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)KY5West Virginia: 1 mapped data center sites; 45 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)WV1New Jersey: 49 mapped data center sites; 595 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NJ49Arizona: 58 mapped data center sites; 337 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)AZ58New Mexico: 11 mapped data center sites; 77 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NM11Kansas: 7 mapped data center sites; 146 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)KS7Arkansas: 2 mapped data center sites; 129 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)AR2Tennessee: 15 mapped data center sites; 248 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)TN15Virginia: 239 mapped data center sites; 641 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)VA239Maryland: 13 mapped data center sites; 448 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MD13Delaware: 0 mapped data center sites; 206 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)DE0Oklahoma: 6 mapped data center sites; 161 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)OK6Louisiana: 1 mapped data center sites; 130 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)LA1Mississippi: 2 mapped data center sites; 74 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)MS2Alabama: 6 mapped data center sites; 152 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)AL6North Carolina: 17 mapped data center sites; 450 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)NC17District of Columbia: 1 mapped data center sites; 119 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)DC1Hawaii: 0 mapped data center sites; 59 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)HI0Texas: 117 mapped data center sites; 1,412 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)TX117Georgia: 31 mapped data center sites; 567 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)GA31South Carolina: 3 mapped data center sites; 186 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)SC3Florida: 15 mapped data center sites; 1,266 NAICS 518210 establishments (2023)FL15

01 to 45 to 1415 to 3940 to 99100+

Each hexagon is one state (equal size, not to scale). Atlas version of 9 February 2026, 1,474 mapped features merged into 1,207 sites. Hover for the Census establishment count.

The concentration is sharp. The top five states hold 636 sites, 53% of the national total, and Virginia alone has more mapped sites than Texas and California combined. By building footprint the lead is similar: Virginia has 41.8 million of the 191 million square feet of data center buildings traced in the atlas (22%). Five states have no mapped site at all. Our broader data center statistics report covers national electricity use and construction spending.

State league table

All 50 states and DC, ranked by mapped data center sites. Census and EIA columns are independent measures, so a state can rank high on one and low on another.

# State Mapped sites Mapped features Building footprint (M sq ft) NAICS 518210 establishments, 2023 Employees, 2023 Employee change, 2019 to 2023 Average pay Commercial power, 2025 (TWh) Commercial power change, 2019 to 2025
1 Virginia 239 319 41.78 641 33,404 +39% $145k 86.6 +60.5%
2 Texas 117 127 18.89 1,412 56,290 +9% $124k 174.7 +23.0%
3 California 109 112 7.29 2,698 123,859 +33% $211k 114.2 -0.1%
4 Oregon 97 109 17.13 231 6,706 +1% $111k 29.8 +81.3%
5 Ohio 74 91 15.37 633 14,692 +7% $112k 57.7 +25.5%
6 Arizona 58 65 9.53 337 14,607 +41% $94k 37.6 +27.9%
7 Washington 52 82 7.88 476 14,485 -13% $201k 33.3 +13.8%
8 New Jersey 49 53 6.54 595 18,632 +13% $140k 37.0 -2.6%
9 Illinois 44 50 7.32 627 21,934 +2% $120k 46.4 -5.9%
10 Iowa 39 63 11.91 126 3,900 -45% $80k 13.6 +10.7%
11 Nevada 36 38 5.24 204 3,419 +13% $104k 14.3 +22.1%
12 Georgia 31 37 6.62 567 26,230 +48% $120k 57.1 +20.5%
13 Colorado 20 20 1.46 554 17,689 +4% $135k 20.9 -0.8%
14 New York 20 21 1.21 1,013 39,730 +13% $247k 72.2 -3.9%
15 Nebraska 18 26 5.39 124 6,313 +49% $112k 15.0 +58.4%
16 North Carolina 17 23 2.25 450 17,241 +7% $112k 50.2 +2.1%
17 Tennessee 15 22 4.74 248 8,802 +79% $78k 36.5 +0.9%
18 Florida 15 16 0.59 1,266 30,385 +10% $122k 100.4 +3.9%
19 Missouri 13 15 1.50 265 7,389 -21% $101k 30.4 +0.8%
20 Maryland 13 13 0.52 448 13,631 +16% $111k 27.7 -4.1%
21 Wisconsin 13 13 0.17 186 5,998 -22% $94k 23.7 +0.8%
22 New Mexico 11 16 3.32 77 943 +22% $92k 9.4 +3.9%
23 Utah 10 15 2.77 268 9,239 +9% $122k 14.8 +24.4%
24 Michigan 10 10 0.27 455 10,198 -9% $104k 37.3 -1.4%
25 Minnesota 9 11 1.25 291 15,633 +32% $127k 22.8 -0.4%
26 Pennsylvania 9 9 0.61 937 19,443 +2% $113k 40.3 +0.4%
27 Kansas 7 7 0.57 146 3,679 +3% $118k 16.2 +2.1%
28 Alabama 6 11 2.12 152 3,588 -2% $75k 22.8 -1.0%
29 Wyoming 6 19 1.16 59 292 -2% $100k 5.6 +58.0%
30 Oklahoma 6 6 0.55 161 3,296 -20% $77k 27.3 +36.1%
31 Connecticut 5 5 0.28 211 4,962 -10% $142k 11.6 -4.3%
32 Indiana 5 5 0.23 258 4,977 -37% $93k 25.6 +9.0%
33 Kentucky 5 5 0.09 441 6,971 -7% $64k 20.8 +6.0%
34 South Carolina 3 12 2.21 186 3,727 -28% $101k 26.5 +19.4%
35 Idaho 3 5 0.71 108 2,002 -28% $101k 7.1 +10.1%
36 Massachusetts 3 3 0.31 510 27,905 +45% $167k 24.4 -3.6%
37 New Hampshire 3 3 0.05 94 3,418 +17% $139k 4.2 -1.2%
38 Mississippi 2 2 0.81 74 1,621 -16% $62k 14.4 +0.9%
39 South Dakota 2 2 0.30 53 425 -14% $72k 5.5 +12.2%
40 Maine 2 2 0.06 64 1,840 +22% $83k 4.1 -1.9%
41 Arkansas 2 2 0.04 129 6,131 +19% $90k 11.9 0.0%
42 North Dakota 2 2 0.03 32 234 -53% $67k 11.5 +63.3%
43 Montana 2 2 0.01 58 701 -16% $83k 5.1 +3.5%
44 District of Columbia 1 1 0.00 119 3,494 +47% $121k 7.2 -9.1%
45 Louisiana 1 1 0.00 130 2,884 +5% $64k 24.0 -1.2%
46 West Virginia 1 1 0.00 45 461 -60% $54k 8.0 +5.9%
47 Alaska 0 0 0.00 33 1,074 +77% $76k 2.6 -1.6%
48 Delaware 0 0 0.00 206 1,743 +81% $157k 4.3 -3.2%
49 Hawaii 0 0 0.00 59 528 -18% $98k 2.8 -7.6%
50 Rhode Island 0 0 0.00 46 488 +1% $96k 3.7 +0.2%
51 Vermont 0 0 0.00 41 2,294 -22% $165k 2.0 +2.9%

Mapped features counts every point, building, and campus object in the atlas; mapped sites removes buildings and points that fall inside a mapped campus (and points inside a mapped building). Employment is mid-March. Average pay is annual payroll divided by employees.

The top five data center states

#1

Virginia

239 mapped sites (19.8% of US)

Building footprint mapped
41.8M sq ft
Top county
Loudoun County (144)
Most-mapped operators
Amazon Web Services (73), Equinix (17), Digital Realty (16)
NAICS 518210, 2023
641 est., 33,404 jobs
Commercial power, 2019 to 2025
54.0 to 86.6 TWh (+60.5%)
Jan to Jul 2026 vs 2025
+6.6%
#2

Texas

117 mapped sites (9.7% of US)

Building footprint mapped
18.9M sq ft
Top county
Bexar County (28)
Most-mapped operators
Microsoft (8), Digital Realty (7), CyrusOne (5)
NAICS 518210, 2023
1,412 est., 56,290 jobs
Commercial power, 2019 to 2025
142.0 to 174.7 TWh (+23.0%)
Jan to Jul 2026 vs 2025
+7.0%
#3

California

109 mapped sites (9.0% of US)

Building footprint mapped
7.3M sq ft
Top county
Santa Clara County (74)
Most-mapped operators
Digital Realty (14), Equinix (13), CoreSite (8)
NAICS 518210, 2023
2,698 est., 123,859 jobs
Commercial power, 2019 to 2025
114.3 to 114.2 TWh (-0.1%)
Jan to Jul 2026 vs 2025
-1.3%
#4

Oregon

97 mapped sites (8.0% of US)

Building footprint mapped
17.1M sq ft
Top county
Umatilla County (31)
Most-mapped operators
Amazon Web Services (51), Quality Technology Services (7), Flexential (7)
NAICS 518210, 2023
231 est., 6,706 jobs
Commercial power, 2019 to 2025
16.4 to 29.8 TWh (+81.3%)
Jan to Jul 2026 vs 2025
+5.7%
#5

Ohio

74 mapped sites (6.1% of US)

Building footprint mapped
15.4M sq ft
Top county
Licking County (25)
Most-mapped operators
Amazon Web Services (32), Meta (5), Quality Technology Services (4)
NAICS 518210, 2023
633 est., 14,692 jobs
Commercial power, 2019 to 2025
46.0 to 57.7 TWh (+25.5%)
Jan to Jul 2026 vs 2025
+15.3%

Operators are as tagged in OpenStreetMap and counted by site. January to July 2026 comparison uses preliminary EIA-861M monthly commercial sales.

Where commercial electricity demand grew

EIA does not publish data center electricity use by state, but data center load shows up in commercial retail sales. From 2019 to 2025, US commercial sales rose 142 TWh. Texas (+32.7 TWh) and Virginia (+32.6 TWh) added almost the same amount, and together they account for 42% of the growth in the 32 states where commercial sales increased. Five states grew 50% or more: Oregon (+81%), North Dakota (+63%), Virginia (+60%), Nebraska (+58%), Wyoming (+58%).

Largest increases in commercial electricity sales, 2019 to 2025

Change in commercial retail sales, TWh (2019 to 2025)Texas: 142.0 TWh in 2019, 174.7 TWh in 2025Texas+32.7 TWh (+23%)Virginia: 54.0 TWh in 2019, 86.6 TWh in 2025Virginia+32.6 TWh (+60%)Oregon: 16.4 TWh in 2019, 29.8 TWh in 2025Oregon+13.3 TWh (+81%)Ohio: 46.0 TWh in 2019, 57.7 TWh in 2025Ohio+11.7 TWh (+25%)Georgia: 47.4 TWh in 2019, 57.1 TWh in 2025Georgia+9.7 TWh (+20%)Arizona: 29.4 TWh in 2019, 37.6 TWh in 2025Arizona+8.2 TWh (+28%)Oklahoma: 20.1 TWh in 2019, 27.3 TWh in 2025Oklahoma+7.2 TWh (+36%)Nebraska: 9.5 TWh in 2019, 15.0 TWh in 2025Nebraska+5.5 TWh (+58%)North Dakota: 7.0 TWh in 2019, 11.5 TWh in 2025North Dakota+4.5 TWh (+63%)South Carolina: 22.2 TWh in 2019, 26.5 TWh in 2025South Carolina+4.3 TWh (+19%)Washington: 29.3 TWh in 2019, 33.3 TWh in 2025Washington+4.0 TWh (+14%)Florida: 96.6 TWh in 2019, 100.4 TWh in 2025Florida+3.8 TWh (+4%)Utah: 11.9 TWh in 2019, 14.8 TWh in 2025Utah+2.9 TWh (+24%)Nevada: 11.7 TWh in 2019, 14.3 TWh in 2025Nevada+2.6 TWh (+22%)Indiana: 23.5 TWh in 2019, 25.6 TWh in 2025Indiana+2.1 TWh (+9%)

EIA-861 annual retail sales, commercial sector, all providers. 2025 values from the file updated 7 October 2026.

Mapped data centers and power growth line up only loosely. Across all states, the rank correlation between mapped sites and percentage growth in commercial sales is 0.35. North Dakota is the clearest outlier: commercial sales up 63% with only 2 mapped sites. EIA has attributed North Dakota’s growth to large computing facilities, which OpenStreetMap barely records. In the other direction, California has 109 mapped sites, yet its commercial sales were essentially flat (-0.1%).

Facilities are not establishments

The Census industry count tells a different story from the map. California has 2,698 NAICS 518210 establishments and 20% of the industry’s 629,527 employees, but only 9% of mapped sites. Virginia ranks 4th for industry employment. Industry jobs follow company offices. Facility siting follows other factors, which EIA describes for Virginia as fiber connectivity, land availability, and power infrastructure. For the full Census picture of IT businesses, see our IT services firms by state atlas.

Share of US mapped sites vs share of NAICS 518210 employees, top 10 states by sites

share of mapped data center sites share of NAICS 518210 employees (2023)

Virginia: 19.8% of mapped sites, 5.3% of NAICS 518210 employeesVirginiaTexas: 9.7% of mapped sites, 8.9% of NAICS 518210 employeesTexasCalifornia: 9.0% of mapped sites, 19.7% of NAICS 518210 employeesCaliforniaOregon: 8.0% of mapped sites, 1.1% of NAICS 518210 employeesOregonOhio: 6.1% of mapped sites, 2.3% of NAICS 518210 employeesOhioArizona: 4.8% of mapped sites, 2.3% of NAICS 518210 employeesArizonaWashington: 4.3% of mapped sites, 2.3% of NAICS 518210 employeesWashingtonNew Jersey: 4.1% of mapped sites, 3.0% of NAICS 518210 employeesNew JerseyIllinois: 3.6% of mapped sites, 3.5% of NAICS 518210 employeesIllinoisIowa: 3.2% of mapped sites, 0.6% of NAICS 518210 employeesIowa0%5%10%15%20%

Counties with the most data centers

# County State Mapped sites
1 Loudoun County Virginia 144
2 Santa Clara County California 74
3 Maricopa County Arizona 56
4 Prince William County Virginia 55
5 Umatilla County Oregon 31
6 Bexar County Texas 28
7 Morrow County Oregon 28
8 Cook County Illinois 26
9 Washington County Oregon 26
10 Fairfax County Virginia 26

The largest mapped data center campuses

Ranked by the land area of the campus outline in OpenStreetMap. Meta and Google operate most of the named campuses on this list. None of the ten is in Virginia, even though it has 31 mapped campuses. Campus land area measures the site, not its power capacity.

# Name in OSM Operator Location Acres
1 Google Montgomery Data Center Google LLC Montgomery County, TN 611
2 Altoona Meta Data Center Meta Polk County, IA 610
3 Meta Eagle Mountain Data Center Utah County, UT 522
4 Google Data Center Google Franklin County, OH 521
5 Meta Los Lunas Data Center Meta Valencia County, NM 501
6 Meta Bowling Green Data Center Wood County, OH 494
7 (no name in OSM) Douglas County, NE 492
8 Meta Beaver Dam Data Center Meta Dodge County, WI 419
9 Meta Prineville Datacenter Meta Crook County, OR 399
10 Gallatin Data Center Meta Sumner County, TN 391

What this means for MSPs

For MSPs choosing colocation, the map is a shortlist: Virginia, Texas, California, Oregon, Ohio, Arizona, Washington, and New Jersey have the most mapped sites. Check the power story before you sign. In states where commercial load has grown fastest, such as Virginia and Oregon, ask a provider how much utility power is contracted for its expansion and when it arrives. For staffing, the Census numbers point somewhere else: hosting and infrastructure jobs are concentrated in California, Texas, New York, and Virginia, where MSPs recruit against large employers. If a client asks whether its state “has data centers”, the answer from the Census data is yes in every state, but mapped data center supply is concentrated in a short list.

Frequently asked questions

What US state has the most data centers?

Virginia. It has 239 of the 1,207 data center sites mapped in PNNL’s Open Source Data Center Atlas (20%), and 22% of all mapped data center building footprint. Texas (117), California (109), Oregon (97), and Ohio (74) follow.

Do all 50 states have data centers?

Every state and DC has establishments in the Census hosting and data processing industry (NAICS 518210); the smallest count in 2023 was 32. In the OpenStreetMap-based PNNL atlas, five states (Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Vermont) have no mapped data center yet, which reflects mapping coverage rather than proof that none exist.

What are the largest data centers in the US by land area?

Among campuses mapped in the PNNL atlas, the largest outlines are Google Montgomery Data Center in Tennessee (611 acres), Altoona Meta Data Center in Iowa (610 acres), and Meta Eagle Mountain Data Center in Utah (522 acres). Land area is not the same as power capacity.

Which states use the most electricity for data centers?

No federal series reports data center electricity by state. The closest signal is commercial electricity sales: from 2019 to 2025, Texas added 32.7 TWh and Virginia 32.6 TWh, together 42% of all growth in states where commercial sales rose. Oregon grew fastest in percentage terms, up 81%.

How many data center companies are there in each state?

Census counted 18,544 establishments in NAICS 518210 in 2023. California had the most (2,698), followed by Texas (1,412). Establishments are business locations, including offices, not data center buildings.

Download the data. data-centers-by-state-2026.csv (CSV). Licensed under CC BY 4.0: free to reuse with attribution to The Uptime Report.

Methodology

Mapped sites. PNNL IM3 Open Source Data Center Atlas, version v2026.02.09 (doi:10.57931/3017294), GeoPackage downloaded from the atlas repository in October 2026. The atlas has three layers derived from OpenStreetMap: 132 campuses, 1,237 buildings, and 105 points (1,474 unique features). Because a campus and its buildings can both appear, we counted each campus once, dropped 255 buildings whose centroid falls inside a mapped campus, and dropped 12 points inside a mapped campus or building, leaving 1,207 sites. Buildings on a campus that has no campus outline still count separately, so the site count leans toward a building count in states mapped building by building. Building footprint sums the building layer’s polygon area (one floor, not total floor space). OpenStreetMap is crowd-sourced and incomplete.

Establishments. U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns, state files 2019 to 2023, NAICS 518210 (computing infrastructure providers, data processing, web hosting, and related services), all legal forms. No state values were suppressed; Census noise flags (G low, H medium, J high) are in the CSV.

Electricity. U.S. Energy Information Administration, EIA-861 historical state retail sales (file updated 7 October 2026), commercial sector, total electric industry. Latest-month comparison uses EIA-861M (preliminary) through July 2026. Commercial sales include all commercial customers, and EIA does not identify which customers are data centers, so this is a proxy.

Limitations. None of these sources is a complete count of data centers. Use the mapped site count for the geography of physical facilities, the Census count for the industry’s business footprint, and EIA sales for the power trend.

Cite as:The Uptime Report. "Data Centers by State: Virginia Holds 1 in 5 Mapped Sites, and Its Commercial Power Use Jumped 60% Since 2019." October 2026. https://theuptimereport.com/data-centers-by-state-2026/

References

  1. Mongird, K. et al., IM3 Open Source Data Center Atlas, v2026.02.09, MSD-LIVE Data Repository (doi:10.57931/3017294). Accessed October 2026.
  2. IMMM-SFA, datacenter-atlas repository (im3_us_data_center_locations.gpkg). Accessed October 2026.
  3. U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns datasets, 2019 to 2023. Accessed October 2026.
  4. U.S. Energy Information Administration, State electricity data, EIA-861 historical retail sales by state. Accessed October 2026.
  5. U.S. Energy Information Administration, EIA-861M monthly sales and revenue. Accessed October 2026.
  6. EIA, Commercial electricity demand grew fastest in states with rapid computing facility growth (June 28, 2024). Accessed October 2026.
  7. EIA, Commercial electricity sales have soared in Virginia, driven by data centers (May 5, 2026). Accessed October 2026.

Research library

More original data reports from The Uptime Report. Every report includes its methodology and a free CSV download. Browse all research

Threats and breaches

Infrastructure and uptime

Regulation and disclosure

Workforce and pay

MSP market and spending

Comments

2 responses to “Data Centers by State: Virginia Holds 1 in 5 Mapped Sites, and Its Commercial Power Use Jumped 60% Since 2019”

  1. Tech Layoffs 2026: Live WARN Notice Tracker

    […] Data Centers by State 2026Sites, jobs, power for every state […]

    Reply
  2. Data Center Statistics 2026: Power, Spending, Jobs

    […] in these totals, so the share of that growth due to data centers is not measured directly. Our data centers by state report shows where commercial electricity sales grew fastest since […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts