Uptime Report Research · Tax Calendar · As of November 5, 2026

Accounting Firm Data Breach 2026: 45 Firms in State AG Filings, and Breaches Start in Tax Season While Notices Do Not

Accounting firm data breach 2026, as of November 5, 2026: six state lists show 45 accounting, CPA and tax firms filing 74 notices since January, level with 2025 on a same-window count (44 firms then, 42 now). The median stated total is 1,547 people. Notices show no tax-season spike, but breach start dates do. A listing is a notice, not a finding of fault.

Notices: no spike43 of 176 firm-years were reported in February to April (24.4%), against 25.4% of all filers. Across all 12 months the pattern is not distinguishable from other filers at the usual 5% level (simulated p = 0.12).
Breach starts: yes54 of 131 firm-years give a start date in February to April (41.2%), against 27.1% of all filers since 2017. A chance result this large has a probability under 0.001. Law firm, dental and school names show nothing like it.
45firms on six lists, Jan 1 to Nov. 5
488,893largest stated total (Mercadien, P.C. CPAs)
17 of 26firms stating a total reach 500 people, the FTC threshold
124 daysmedian, stated breach date to first notice (31 firms)

Search results for this query offer checklists from vendors, single-firm stories and class action pages, and a claim that CPA firm breaches rose 80 percent over eight years, which on the checklist page we read links back to a 2020 Tax Adviser article. None tests the question every firm asks: is filing season really when you get hit? We matched every 2025 and 2026 notice on the California, Indiana, Massachusetts, Texas, Vermont and Washington lists against a written name rule, then tested the months against all other filers.

The latest accounting firm breach filings

Newest filing Firm List People, largest stated
Oct 21 Michael J. Berger and Co., CPA LLP Massachusetts OCABR 1,630
Oct 20 Mercadien, P.C. CPAs California AG 488,893
Oct 17 Frazer LLP Massachusetts OCABR 1
Oct 15 emc CPAs LLC Indiana AG 3,003
Oct 8 Gromm Tax Services Inc Indiana AG 85
Oct 2 Keil & Associates, CPAs, PC Indiana AG 341
Oct 1 Aldrich Services LLP California AG 3,202
Oct 1 Larry C. Kent, C.P.A Massachusetts OCABR 2

A row means a firm filed a breach notice with a state regulator. It is not a finding that the firm did anything wrong, and we state only what the filing says.

Is there a tax-season spike in accounting firm breaches?

Not reliably in the filings. The IRS opened the 2026 season on January 26 with an April 15 deadline and an automatic six-month extension, so those are the marks to look for. In 2026, 16 of 42 firms first filed in February to April, which looks like a spring bump. In 2025 the same months held 9 of 44, and the peak came in May and June. Two years pull in opposite directions, so we looked further back.

20252026JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctJan 2025: 1 firms by first notice1Feb 2025: 3 firms by first notice3Mar 2025: 3 firms by first notice3Apr 2025: 3 firms by first notice3May 2025: 8 firms by first notice8Jun 2025: 8 firms by first notice8Jul 2025: 4 firms by first notice4Aug 2025: 5 firms by first notice5Sep 2025: 5 firms by first notice5Oct 2025: 4 firms by first notice4Jan 2026: 0 firms by first notice0Feb 2026: 2 firms by first notice2Mar 2026: 6 firms by first notice6Apr 2026: 8 firms by first notice8May 2026: 4 firms by first notice4Jun 2026: 6 firms by first notice6Jul 2026: 1 firms by first notice1Aug 2026: 4 firms by first notice4Sep 2026: 4 firms by first notice4Oct 2026: 7 firms by first notice7Filing season monthsOct 15 extension deadline

California, Indiana, Massachusetts and Washington lists: month of a firm’s first notice in each year. November and December are left out so the years compare.

We widened the sample to every matched firm-year since 2017 on the California, Washington, Indiana (2021 on), Massachusetts (2025 on, notice dates only) and Texas lists, using all other filers on those lists as the baseline. That baseline matters because breach notices vary by month for everyone. The left panel shows when notices arrive, and the right panel shows when the breach is said to have begun. The dark line is all filers, and red bars mark February to April.

Month the notice was filed176 firm-years. Feb to Apr 24.4% against 25.4% for all filersJan: 6 of 176 (3.4%), all filers 7.5%JFeb: 13 of 176 (7.4%), all filers 7.7%FMar: 19 of 176 (10.8%), all filers 9.0%MApr: 11 of 176 (6.2%), all filers 8.6%AMay: 24 of 176 (13.6%), all filers 9.1%MJun: 23 of 176 (13.1%), all filers 8.6%JJul: 17 of 176 (9.7%), all filers 9.5%JAug: 15 of 176 (8.5%), all filers 9.8%ASep: 17 of 176 (9.7%), all filers 8.6%SOct: 14 of 176 (8.0%), all filers 8.9%ONov: 10 of 176 (5.7%), all filers 5.9%NDec: 7 of 176 (4.0%), all filers 6.7%DMonth the breach began131 firm-years. Feb to Apr 41.2% against 27.1% for all filersJan: 12 of 131 (9.2%), all filers 8.3%JFeb: 19 of 131 (14.5%), all filers 10.7%FMar: 21 of 131 (16.0%), all filers 8.6%MApr: 14 of 131 (10.7%), all filers 7.7%AMay: 14 of 131 (10.7%), all filers 10.7%MJun: 8 of 131 (6.1%), all filers 6.7%JJul: 10 of 131 (7.6%), all filers 7.4%JAug: 5 of 131 (3.8%), all filers 8.0%ASep: 8 of 131 (6.1%), all filers 7.5%SOct: 2 of 131 (1.5%), all filers 7.7%ONov: 7 of 131 (5.3%), all filers 8.4%NDec: 11 of 131 (8.4%), all filers 8.2%D

The two panels disagree, and the gap is the finding. Notices are flat against the baseline. Start dates are not: 41.2% fall in February to April, about 1.5 times the expected share. August to October, the extension season, runs the other way at 11.5% against 23.2%. So there is no autumn peak to match the spring one. Half of the 54 firm-years that began in February to April reached notice within 104 days, and 47 of them were noticed after that year’s April 15, which is why a list sorted by notice date hides it.

Test (February to April share) Firm-years Accounting firms All filers Chance probability
Notice filed, all lists 176 24.4% 25.4% 0.64
Breach began, all lists 131 41.2% 27.1% under 0.001
Breach began, California only 53 49.1% 26.8% under 0.001
Breach began, Indiana only 87 39.1% 26.7% 0.008
Breach began, notices through 2024 80 43.8% 27.5% 0.001
Breach began, notices 2025 and 2026 51 37.3% 26.2% 0.05

Chance probability is an exact one-sided binomial test against the all-filer share, with February to April chosen in advance from the IRS calendar. Start dates are as stated by filers, and many filers give a date range; we use the earliest date on the record.

The recent years are weaker on their own: 37.3% against 26.2% for notices filed in 2025 and 2026, with a probability of 0.05, on only 51 firm-years. So the pattern is well supported over the decade and only suggestive for this year. We also ran the same test on other groups as a check. If the spike were an artifact of how lists record dates, it should show up there too, and it does not.

All filers 27.1%Accounting, CPA and tax names: 54 of 131 breaches began February to AprilAccounting, CPA and tax names41.2% (n = 131)Law firm names: 27 of 89 breaches began February to AprilLaw firm names30.3% (n = 89)Dental names: 11 of 48 breaches began February to AprilDental names22.9% (n = 48)School district names: 46 of 229 breaches began February to AprilSchool district names20.1% (n = 229)

These data do not show why the breaches begin then. The start date could reflect attackers timing the season, more client data moving through portals and email in those months, or earlier intrusions that are only detected in spring. The lists cannot separate those.

How many accounting firm breaches were reported, and how big?

Firm counts are level on 2025. On the four lists with a 2025 file, January 1 to October 31 (October 13 for Washington) went from 44 firms to 42, or 37 to 34 using only the name rule with no LLP reading. All filers on those lists moved from 3,888 notices to 3,920.

List All notices 2025 All notices 2026 Accounting firm notices 2025 Accounting firm notices 2026
California AG 464 491 7 12
Indiana AG 1,399 1,359 25 23
Massachusetts OCABR 1,853 1,910 32 26
Washington AG (to Oct 13) 172 160 1 0

Most stated totals are small. The median of 26 stated totals is 1,547 people, and 22 of 26 are under 5,000. 15 more firms list only one state’s residents, and 4 list no count. Two filings stand apart: Mercadien, P.C. CPAs at 488,893 on Indiana’s list, and Forrestall CPAs LLC at 60,843. A client’s filing confirms the first: SR Bancorp told the SEC that files on Mercadien’s servers, which it uses for internal audit work, included bank customer data, so the exposure reaches customers of the firm’s clients.

Month Firms, first notice Notices People, largest stated per firm Firms whose stated breach began this month of 2026
Jan 1 1 900 2
Feb 2 2 488,893 4
Mar 7 7 310 4
Apr 8 12 25,850 2
May 4 6 12 3
Jun 7 11 7,852 0
Jul 1 3 4,202 2
Aug 4 9 64,342 1
Sep 4 7 4,038 0
Oct 7 16 8,264 0
Nov* 0 0 0

Filing-season months shaded. *November through Nov. 5 only. People sums the largest figure each firm stated and places it in the month of first notice. 13 of the 31 firms with a stated breach date describe a breach that began before 2026, so they do not appear in the last column.

Firm type, from the name Firms Median total Largest stated
CPA firm (CPA in the name) 25 1,245 488,893
Tax preparation or tax services 9 184 2,182
LLP or other name, confirmed by reading 8 3,702 16,683
Accounting or accountants (no CPA in name) 3 3,471 3,471

How did the breaches happen?

Only 10 of 45 firms state a cause we could read, partly because Massachusetts letters leave the nature of the incident out. The named causes are specific to this trade: tax software appears in three, and two of those describe fraudulent or suspicious returns. Platt, Miller & Jacobs, CPAs, LLP says an attacker used an employee’s Outlook account to send phishing emails to clients. The sample is small, so read this as examples, not rates.

Cause as stated Firms Who
Tax software or tax filing access named 3 DOUGLAS M SMITH & CO CPAS; Solari Accountancy, Inc; Town CPA: Nune Khachatrian, CPA, P.C
Email account or environment named 3 Smith & James, CPAs; Platt, Miller & Jacobs, CPAs, LLP; Aldrich Services LLP
Network or systems access, method not named 3 Williams Accountancy Corporation; Forrestall CPAs LLC; DeMera DeMera Cameron, LLP
Security vulnerability named 1 Mercadien, P.C. CPAs

Massachusetts also records what each notice covered: 100% of the 26 accounting firm notices there list Social Security numbers and 62% list financial accounts. The IRS warns that criminals want client data “in order to file fraudulent tax returns for refunds”.

In the notice (Massachusetts, 2026) Accounting firms (26) All filers (1,923)
Social Security numbers 100% 75%
Financial accounts 62% 37%
Driver licenses 31% 33%
Credit or debit cards 15% 19%
Medical records 8% 21%

How long until notice, against the FTC’s 30 days?

The FTC clock runs from discovery, and it covers a notice to the FTC, not to consumers or states. These lists do not show FTC filings, and our FTC Safeguards Rule breach notification report found no public list of them, so this chart cannot test compliance. It shows the only related clocks available. Each dot is a filing; the triangle is the median for all filers on that list. Texas is the one list here with a discovery date for these firms, with a median of 34.5 days from discovery to the AG’s posting, which can trail the filing.

1 week30 days90 days6 months1 yearIndiana: breach date to consumer notice (n = 23, median 147 days)3 E Tax Solutions LLC: 70 daysAldrich Services LLP: 40 daysAllred Tax Advisors PLLC: 230 daysBlair C Diaz CPA PC: 88 daysCatalanatto & Barnes CPAs LLC: 139 daysCornick, Garber, & Sandler LLP: 412 daysDeMera DeMera Cameron LLP: 159 daysemc CPAs LLC: 219 daysForrestall CPAs LLC: 228 daysFox Valley Tax Solutions: 54 daysGreen Accounting & Tax LLC: 112 daysGromm Tax Services Inc: 147 daysHallisey & D’Agostino LLP: 201 daysHerman & Chamow, CPAs: 212 daysJLK Rosenberger LLP: 103 daysKeil & Associates, CPAs, PC: 324 daysKrueger & Associates, CPAs, LLC: 60 daysMather & Co CPAs LLC: 123 daysMercadien PC Certified Public Accountants: 153 daysMichael J. Berger and Co, CPA LLP: 398 daysMisdannies Accounting & Tax Professionals: 28 daysTerrence Bronowski CPA: 124 daysWei Wei & Company LLP: 248 daysAll filers on this list, median 133 daysCalifornia: breach date to AG posting (n = 11, median 85 days)Mercadien, P.C. CPAs: 398 daysFrazer LLP: 570 daysAldrich Services LLP: 40 daysDeMera DeMera Cameron, LLP: 158 daysLangwasser & Company CPAs: 104 daysForrestall CPAs LLC: 238 daysSmith & James, CPAs: 84 daysSolari Accountancy, Inc.: 12 daysDOUGLAS M SMITH & CO CPAS: 85 daysWilliams Accountancy Corporation: 69 daysDC Professional Tax Service: 2 daysAll filers on this list, median 145 daysTexas: discovery to AG posting (n = 6, median 34.5 days)Mercadien PC Certified Public Accountants: 340 daysForrestall CPAs LLC: 45 daysFinch CPA Firm PLLC: 13 daysAllred Tax Advisors, PLLC: 17 daysDana Lee CPA LLC: 24 daysAA CPA Tax Strategies LLC: 92 daysAll filers on this list, median 41 days

From stated breach date, Indiana’s median for these firms is 147 days against 133 for all filers, and California’s is 85 against 145. 13 of 31 firms with a stated date describe a breach that began in an earlier calendar year. For comparison across sectors, see how long companies take to report data breaches.

WISP checklist: what the rule and the IRS require

16 CFR 314.2(h)(2)(viii) names “an accountant or other tax preparation service that is in the business of completing income tax returns” as a financial institution. IRS Publication 5708 (Rev. 8-2024) says: “A requirement of the Safeguards Rule is implementing and maintaining a WISP. Your WISP must be written and accessible.” Publication 4557 (Rev. 6-2024) adds: “Failure to do so may result in an FTC investigation.” Firms holding data on fewer than 5,000 consumers skip four provisions, marked below, and nothing else. Tick what is in place; the count updates as you go. Stated breach totals are not the same as customers held, so 22 of 26 firms under 5,000 affected does not tell you who is exempt.

0 of 15 items ready

Item Source Applies under 5,000 consumers? What IT supplies
16 CFR 314.4(a); Pub 5708 Part II Yes May sit at a service provider, but the firm keeps responsibility and needs a senior overseer.
314.4(b); Pub 5708 Part III Assessment yes, written form exempt Supply the asset and data list the assessment starts from.
314.4(c)(1) Yes Least privilege in the tax suite, the portal and the file share.
314.4(c)(2); Pub 5708 Part IV Yes Export from RMM: description, location and what each device stores.
314.4(c)(3) Yes Disk encryption reports, secure portal instead of email attachments.
314.4(c)(5); Pub 4557 says all companies regardless of size Yes Tax software, portal, email, remote access, with written approval for any exception.
314.4(c)(6) Yes Retention job on the file server, with listed exceptions documented.
314.4(c)(8) Yes Keep sign-in and mailbox audit logs through and past filing season.
314.4(d)(2): annual penetration test and vulnerability assessment at least every six months Exempt Offer it anyway to firms close to the threshold.
314.4(e) Yes Run a phishing drill before late January, when the season opens.
314.4(f); Pub 5708 Yes That includes you: contract language on safeguards and periodic reassessment.
314.4(h) Exempt, but Pub 5708 includes incident steps Named contacts, IRS liaison, state agencies and insurer, on paper.
314.4(i) Exempt Offer a one-page annual summary.
314.4(j): as soon as possible, no later than 30 days after discovery Yes Log the discovery date the moment it happens.
IRS data theft page: local stakeholder liaison, plus states where returns are prepared Yes Keep the liaison’s name in the plan. Speed lets the IRS block fraudulent returns.

16 CFR Part 314 text current to 2026-10-29 on eCFR. Exemptions from 314.6. This summarizes the rule and is not legal advice.

What this means for MSPs

  1. Do not relax monitoring in the busy months. 41% of stated start dates fall in February to April. Freeze risky changes if the firm asks, but keep detection running, and schedule a mailbox and sign-in review for the week after April 15.
  2. Put the tax suite inside your security scope. Three notices name tax software or tax filing access, including one that describes a fraudulent return. Multi-factor on the tax suite falls under 314.4(c)(5), so check whether it sits inside your identity tooling. If not, ask for an admin view, or get it in writing that the firm owns it.
  3. Run the weekly EFIN and PTIN check as a ticket. Publication 4557 tells firms to check e-File Application and PTIN account totals weekly. You cannot log in for them, but you can raise the reminder weekly in season and record the answer, which then serves as evidence for the program.
  4. Offer to be the Qualified Individual, with care. 314.4(a) allows a service provider in that role, but the firm keeps responsibility and must name a senior overseer. Price it as a role with a written scope, not a free add-on.
  5. Build the WISP from your own data. Publication 5708 asks for an inventory with device location and data stored, a list of authorized users and access levels, and incident steps. RMM and identity exports cover most of that, which makes this a fast, concrete first project for a new CPA client.
  6. Write the first-hour list. The IRS says speed lets it block fraudulent returns. Put the stakeholder liaison, state tax agencies, FBI, police and the FTC threshold on one page, and log the discovery date immediately, because the 30 days run from it. 17 of 26 firms stating a total reach 500 people.
  7. Plan for clients of your client. Mercadien’s filing reached a bank’s SEC disclosure. Firms that do audit or payroll work hold other companies’ employee and customer data, and Blair C Diaz CPA, PC tells recipients it performs payroll services for their employer. Map that data separately, since it changes who must be told.

Every 2026 accounting firm notice in this report

45 firms, newest first. Click a heading to sort. Each list link goes to the primary record: a Massachusetts or California letter or record where one exists, otherwise the state list itself. Texas and the newer Vermont rows live in the state’s own table, so search the firm name there.

Firm First notice Breach date as stated People, largest stated Filings by list Breach type as stated Type
Michael J. Berger and Co., CPA LLP Oct 20 Sep 17, 2025 1,630 IN Oct 20: 1,630 total, 1 residents
MA Oct 21: 8 residents
VT Oct 21: 5 residents
Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Frazer LLP Oct 16 Mar 25, 2025 1 MA residents only CA Oct 16: count not listed
MA Oct 17: 1 residents
Not stated in what we read Other
emc CPAs LLC Oct 15 Mar 10, 2026 3,003 IN Oct 15: 3,003 total, 2 residents
MA Oct 15: 10 residents
Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Gromm Tax Services Inc Oct 8 May 14, 2026 85 IN Oct 8: 85 total, 1 residents Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Keil & Associates, CPAs, PC Oct 2 Nov 12, 2025 341 IN Oct 2: 341 total, 1 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Aldrich Services LLP Oct 1 Aug 22, 2026 3,202 CA Oct 1: count not listed
IN Oct 1: 3,202 total, 4 residents
MA Oct 1: 8 residents
employee email account accessed Other
Larry C. Kent, C.P.A Oct 1 Not stated 2 MA residents only MA Oct 1: 2 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
3 E Tax Solutions LLC Sep 30 Jul 22, 2026 184 IN Sep 30: 184 total, 2 residents Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Blair C Diaz CPA, PC Sep 28 Jul 2, 2026 1,465 IN Sep 28: 1,465 total, 4 residents
MA Sep 29: 2 residents
Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Platt, Miller & Jacobs, CPAs, LLP Sep 28 Not stated 2 MA residents only MA Sep 28: 2 residents Outlook account accessed and used to send phishing to clients CPA firm (CPA in the name)
DeMera DeMera Cameron, LLP Sep 1 Mar 26, 2026 2,387 CA Sep 1: count not listed
IN Sep 1: 2,387 total, 2 residents
VT Sep 1: 1 residents
suspicious activity in network Other
Alan Gordon, CPA Aug 26 Not stated 6 MA residents only MA Aug 26: 6 residents
VT Aug 26: 4 residents
Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Langwasser & Company CPAs Aug 17 May 5, 2026 22 MA residents only CA Aug 17: count not listed
MA Aug 17: 22 residents
Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Green Accounting & Tax LLC Aug 13 Apr 23, 2026 3,471 IN Aug 13: 3,471 total, 1 residents Not stated in what we read Accounting or accountants (no CPA in name)
Forrestall CPAs LLC Aug 7 Dec 22, 2025 60,843 IN Aug 7: 60,843 total, 367 residents
CA Aug 17: count not listed
MA Aug 17: 218 residents
TX Aug 21: 60,843 total, 3,725 residents
unauthorized access to certain systems CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Wei Wei & Company LLP Jul 29 Nov 23, 2025 4,202 IN Jul 29: 4,202 total, 2 residents
MA Jul 29: 6 residents
VT Jul 29: 2 residents
Not stated in what we read Other
Fox Valley Tax Solutions Jun 29 May 6, 2026 2,182 IN Jun 29: 2,182 total, 20 residents
MA Jun 29: 2 residents
Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Mather & Co CPAs LLC Jun 29 Feb 26, 2026 281 IN Jun 29: 281 total, 17 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Catalanatto & Barnes CPAs LLC Jun 24 Feb 5, 2026 3,209 IN Jun 24: 3,209 total, 2 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Finch CPA Firm PLLC Jun 22 Jan 12, 2026 300 TX Jun 22: 300 total, 280 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Joseph A. Cannova CPA CFP Jun 9 Not stated 7 MA residents only MA Jun 9: 7 residents
VT Jun 9: 5 residents
Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Allred Tax Advisors, PLLC Jun 4 Oct 17, 2025 848 IN Jun 4: 848 total, 4 residents
MA Jun 4: 3 residents
TX Jun 5: 848 total, 781 residents
Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Herman & Chamow, CPAs Jun 3 Nov 3, 2025 1,025 IN Jun 3: 1,025 total, 5 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Smith & James, CPAs May 28 Mar 5, 2026 1 MA residents only CA May 28: count not listed
MA May 28: 1 residents
suspicious activity in the email environment CPA firm (CPA in the name)
R&G Brenner Income Tax May 15 Not stated 1 MA residents only MA May 15: 1 residents Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Town CPA: Nune Khachatrian, CPA, P.C May 15 Not stated 6 MA residents only MA May 15: 6 residents suspicious activity in tax preparation software; returns filed with suspicious bank account details CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Walker Accounting & Tax Service May 4 Not stated 4 MA residents only MA May 4: 4 residents Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Kings Tax Service Apr 30 Not stated 57 MA residents only MA Apr 30: 57 residents Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Castiglia, LLP Apr 28 Not stated 2 VT residents only MA Apr 28: 2 residents
VT Apr 28: 2 residents
Not stated in what we read Other
Krueger & Associates, CPAs, LLC Apr 27 Feb 26, 2026 3,000 IN Apr 27: 3,000 total, 2,975 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Solari Accountancy, Inc Apr 20 Apr 8, 2026 Not listed CA Apr 20: count not listed access to the tax software system Accounting or accountants (no CPA in name)
Hallisey & D’Agostino, LLP Apr 17 Sep 28, 2025 16,683 IN Apr 17: 16,683 total, 10 residents
MA Apr 18: 737 residents
VT Apr 18: 182 residents
Not stated in what we read Other
DOUGLAS M SMITH & CO CPAS Apr 15 Jan 20, 2026 Not listed CA Apr 15: count not listed an unauthorized user reached third-party tax filing software and filed a fraudulent return; the firm does not believe its network or the software was the source CPA firm (CPA in the name)
JLK Rosenberger LLP Apr 8 Dec 26, 2025 244 IN Apr 8: 244 total, 3 residents Not stated in what we read Other
Cornick, Garber & Sandler, LLP Apr 2 Feb 14, 2025 5,864 IN Apr 2: 5,864 total, 6 residents
MA Apr 3: 129 residents
MA May 14: 5 residents
Not stated in what we read Other
Misdannies Accounting & Tax Professionals Mar 30 Mar 2, 2026 100 IN Mar 30: 100 total, 100 residents Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Dana Lee CPA LLC Mar 27 Not stated 150 TX Mar 27: 150 total, 150 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Schiff and Associates CPA Mar 19 Not stated 1 MA residents only MA Mar 19: 1 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Neil I. Sidi, C.P.A Mar 16 Not stated 22 MA residents only MA Mar 16: 22 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Kerkering, Barberio & Co., Certified Public Accountants Mar 13 Not stated 21 MA residents only MA Mar 13: 21 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Terrence Bronowski CPA Mar 5 Nov 1, 2025 16 IN Mar 5: 16 total, 15 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)
Williams Accountancy Corporation Mar 4 Dec 25, 2025 Not listed CA Mar 4: count not listed access to network Accounting or accountants (no CPA in name)
DC Professional Tax Service Feb 26 Feb 24, 2026 Not listed CA Feb 26: count not listed Not stated in what we read Tax preparation or tax services
Mercadien, P.C. CPAs Feb 17 Sep 17, 2025 488,893 IN Feb 17: 488,893 total, 86,221 residents
CA Oct 12: count not listed
TX Oct 13: 5,219 residents
CA Oct 20: count not listed
exploitation of a security vulnerability CPA firm (CPA in the name)
AA CPA Tax Strategies LLC Jan 27 Not stated 900 TX Jan 27: 900 total, 750 residents Not stated in what we read CPA firm (CPA in the name)

Frequently asked questions

Which accounting firms had a data breach in 2026?

As of November 5, 2026, 45 accounting, CPA and tax firms appear on six state lists. The newest are Michael J. Berger and Co., CPA LLP (Oct 21), Mercadien, P.C. CPAs (Oct 20), Frazer LLP (Oct 17), emc CPAs LLC (Oct 15). The largest stated totals are Mercadien, P.C. CPAs (488,893) and Forrestall CPAs LLC (60,843). A listing is a notice, not a finding of fault.

How many accounting firm data breaches happened in 2026?

We count 45 firms and 74 notices from January 1 to November 5, 2026. On the four lists with a 2025 file, the same window went from 44 firms to 42, so the count is level. This is a floor, since names without an accounting term are missed and most states publish no list.

Do accounting firm data breaches spike in tax season?

The notices do not: 24.4% of notices are filed in February to April, against 25.4% for all filers. The breaches do: since 2017, 41.2% of stated start dates at these firms fall in those months, against 27.1% for all filers. Notice arrives a median 104 days later, which hides the pattern.

Is a WISP required for accounting firms?

Yes for firms that complete income tax returns. 16 CFR 314.2 names them as financial institutions, and IRS Publication 5708 says a requirement of the Safeguards Rule is implementing and maintaining a written information security plan, regardless of size. Publication 4557 warns that failure may result in an FTC investigation.

Do accounting firms have to report a data breach to the FTC?

Yes, when unencrypted customer information of at least 500 consumers is acquired without authorization: as soon as possible and no later than 30 days after discovery, under 16 CFR 314.4(j). That sits on top of state notices and the IRS request to contact your stakeholder liaison.

What should an accounting firm do first after a breach?

The IRS data theft page lists contacting the local IRS stakeholder liaison, the FBI, the Secret Service if directed, and local police, reporting to the FTC at 500 or more people, and contacting states where the firm prepares returns. It stresses that quick reports let the IRS block fraudulent returns.

Download the data. accounting-firm-data-breach-notices-2026.csv (CSV). Licensed under CC BY 4.0: free to reuse with attribution to The Uptime Report.

Methodology

Sources and dates. Washington AG dataset sb4j-ca4h (last notice October 13, 2026), California AG list export and record pages (to November 3), Indiana AG year-to-date PDFs for 2021 to 2026, Massachusetts OCABR 2025 and 2026 PDFs and letter lists (to November 3), Texas AG breach report table (to November 3, about 12 months of history), Vermont AG table and notice documents (to November 4). Retrieved November 5, 2026.

Name rule. A name containing CPA, CPAs, C.P.A., certified public accountant, accountant(s), accountancy, accounting, bookkeeping, income tax, or tax followed by services, preparation, solutions, group, advisors, consultants, professionals, associates, relief, resolution, center, office, firm or partners. We exclude tax authorities, county and state offices, banks, credit unions, hospitals, schools, software and staffing names (such as patient accounting and accounting software) and societies. Tax relief and tax service companies are included because the rule cannot separate them from preparers, and the table labels them. In addition, 15 names with LLP and no accounting term count here because their notice or own site says they are accountants; we found them while checking LLP names for our separate law firm count.

Precision. We drew a random sample of 25 of the 45 2026 firms (seed 20261105) and read each one’s name, notice or site: 25 of 25 are accounting, CPA or tax firms, which at 95% confidence still allows an error rate up to about 11%.

Recall is unmeasured. We cannot say how many accounting firm breaches this misses. Firms whose names carry no accounting term, including many large partnerships, are out unless reading caught them, and most states publish no list. Maine’s public database is still offline as of November 5, 2026 (AG notice), Delaware’s database shows no notice after July 11, 2025, Oregon’s site disallows robots, and Maryland, Montana and South Carolina returned 403 to our requests, so we did not use them.

Seasonality test. Firm-years use the name rule alone, without the LLP reading, one per firm and calendar year of the date tested, from 2017 to 2026. The baseline is every other notice on the same lists. Rows need the date and a notice on or after it. The 12-month figure is a chi-square statistic compared with 4,000 simulated draws from the baseline (seed 11). Late 2026 is incomplete for all filers alike. Comparison groups: names with explicit law firm terms, dental names, and school district names.

Counting. Firms merge across lists within a year on a normalized name and a close match for typos. A notice is one row on one list. People is the largest total stated on any list, or the largest resident count if no total is listed. Causes come from reading available letters and are coded only where stated. Texas and Vermont stay out of the 2025 comparison because Texas lists about 12 months and Vermont’s older titles drop suffixes.

Not advice. This is a record of public filings and published guidance, not legal or compliance advice. A listing does not imply fault by any firm.

Cite as:The Uptime Report. "Accounting Firm Data Breach 2026: 45 Firms in State AG Filings, and Breaches Start in Tax Season While Notices Do Not." November 2026. https://theuptimereport.com/accounting-firm-data-breach-2026/

References

  1. Washington Attorney General, Data Breach Notifications (data.wa.gov). Accessed November 2026.
  2. California Attorney General, Search Data Security Breaches. Accessed November 2026.
  3. Indiana Attorney General, Security Breaches, year-to-date reports. Accessed November 2026.
  4. Massachusetts OCABR, 2026 Data Breach Notification Report. Accessed November 2026.
  5. Massachusetts OCABR, 2025 Data Breach Notification Report. Accessed November 2026.
  6. Texas Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reports. Accessed November 2026.
  7. Vermont Attorney General, Security Breach Notices. Accessed November 2026.
  8. 16 CFR Part 314, Safeguards Rule (eCFR). Accessed November 2026.
  9. IRS Publication 5708, Creating a Written Information Security Plan. Accessed November 2026.
  10. IRS Publication 4557, Safeguarding Taxpayer Data. Accessed November 2026.
  11. IRS, Data Theft Information for Tax Professionals. Accessed November 2026.
  12. IRS, IR-2026-12, January 26, 2026, filing season opens. Accessed November 2026.
  13. IRS, When to file. Accessed November 2026.
  14. SR Bancorp Form 8-K, Item 8.01, July 2026. Accessed November 2026.
  15. Maine Attorney General, Data Security Breaches. Accessed November 2026.

Research library

More original data reports from The Uptime Report. Every report includes its methodology and a free CSV download. Browse all research

Threats and breaches

Infrastructure and uptime

Regulation and disclosure

Workforce and pay

MSP market and spending

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *