Credit Union Cybersecurity Statistics 2026: 55% of Credit Unions Do Not Enforce DMARC, Five Years After NCUA Urged It
These credit union cybersecurity statistics come from our own measurement, as of November 11, 2026: we took the website address every federally insured credit union reports to NCUA on its June 30, 2026 Call Report and checked the public DNS and homepage of each. Of 3,730 credit unions measured, 55% do not enforce DMARC, the email setting that stops criminals from sending mail as the credit union. The 45% that do enforce it serve 80% of members.
Key findings
- 55% of the 3,730 federally insured credit unions whose reported website domain we could measure (2,040) do not enforce DMARC: 886 have no valid DMARC record and 1,154 publish p=none.
- 45% (1,690) enforce a DMARC policy, 980 at p=quarantine and 710 at p=reject; only 19% use the strictest setting.
- The enforcing credit unions hold 80% of members (116.6 million of 145.6 million), because large credit unions enforce far more often than small ones.
- Enforcement climbs the asset ladder from 15% of credit unions under $10 million to 78% of those with $1 billion to $10 billion.
- By state, Michigan (64%) and Florida (64%) lead; New Jersey (27%) and Pennsylvania (29%) trail among states with at least 10 measured credit unions.
- 45% of domains receive mail directly at Microsoft 365 and 31% through a security gateway, led by Proofpoint (394), Barracuda (262) and Mimecast (213).
- On the web side, 95.7% of 3,503 credit union homepages we reached redirect HTTP to HTTPS and 54% send an HSTS header (from 36% under $10M to 77% at $1B to $10B); only 8.1% of domains are DNSSEC-signed.
The asset-band ladder: DMARC policy by credit union size
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance, RFC 7489) is a DNS record at _dmarc. plus the domain. With p=quarantine or p=reject, receiving mail servers are told to junk or refuse messages that claim to come from the credit union but fail authentication. With p=none, or no record, a spoofed message is delivered like any other. The share of credit unions that enforce rises at every step of the asset ladder:
Each bar is 100% of measured credit unions in the band (total assets on the June 30, 2026 Call Report). Right-hand figure: quarantine plus reject. 7 domains with malformed or duplicate DMARC records are counted as having no valid record.
Under $10 million in assets, 35% of credit unions publish any DMARC record and 15% enforce one. Between $100 million and $500 million, enforcement reaches 55%; from $1 billion to $10 billion, 78%, and 46% of that band use p=reject. 64 enforcing domains apply the policy to only part of their mail through a pct value below 100. Among domains with any DMARC record, 70% ask for aggregate reports (a rua address), the feed an administrator needs before tightening the policy.
| Total assets | Credit unions | Measured domains | Any DMARC | DMARC enforced | p=reject | SPF -all | DNSSEC | HTTPS redirect | TLS 1.3 | HSTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under $10M | 761 | 365 | 35% | 15% | 8% | 43% | 1% | 89% | 77% | 36% |
| $10M to $50M | 1,117 | 1,044 | 62% | 29% | 11% | 56% | 3% | 95% | 85% | 38% |
| $50M to $100M | 560 | 551 | 76% | 38% | 13% | 55% | 7% | 98% | 91% | 51% |
| $100M to $500M | 1,028 | 1,023 | 91% | 55% | 20% | 54% | 9% | 97% | 91% | 62% |
| $500M to $1B | 277 | 277 | 95% | 69% | 23% | 52% | 12% | 98% | 90% | 73% |
| $1B to $10B | 446 | 445 | 97% | 78% | 46% | 44% | 19% | 96% | 90% | 77% |
| $10B and up | 25 | 25 | 96% | 88% | 60% | 36% | 36% | 100% | 80% | 95% |
DNS columns are shares of measured domains; web columns are shares of homepages reached (3,503 in total). Web shares count every homepage reached, so a site whose TLS handshake we did not see lowers the TLS 1.3 column.
By membership size
Counting people rather than institutions changes the picture. 1,480 credit unions have fewer than 2,500 members, and 23% of those measured enforce DMARC. Of the 100 credit unions with 250,000 members or more, 87% enforce, 63% at p=reject.
| Members | Credit unions | Measured | Any DMARC | Enforced | p=reject | HTTPS redirect | HSTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2,500 | 1,480 | 1,016 | 50% | 23% | 10% | 92% | 36% |
| 2,500 to 9,999 | 1,255 | 1,241 | 76% | 38% | 14% | 97% | 49% |
| 10,000 to 49,999 | 949 | 944 | 93% | 60% | 21% | 98% | 66% |
| 50,000 to 249,999 | 430 | 429 | 97% | 76% | 41% | 97% | 75% |
| 250,000 and up | 100 | 100 | 98% | 87% | 63% | 97% | 87% |
Charter type matters a little: 51% of federally insured state-chartered credit unions enforce DMARC against 42% of federal credit unions. The low-income designation makes almost no difference (47% vs 43%).
Provider split: who receives credit union email
We classified each domain by the host in its lowest-preference MX record, the same method as our Microsoft 365 market share census. Bars show the share of measured domains; the right-hand figure is the DMARC enforcement rate inside each group.
| Mail route | Domains | Share | DMARC enforced |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft 365 (direct) | 1,669 | 45% | 51% |
| Security gateway | 1,151 | 31% | 56% |
| Google Workspace (direct) | 148 | 4% | 15% |
| Own mail server | 113 | 3% | 21% |
| Other host or provider | 465 | 12% | 28% |
| No mail server (no MX) | 184 | 5% | 11% |
| Security gateway | Domains | Share of all | DMARC enforced |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proofpoint | 394 | 10.6% | 57% |
| Barracuda | 262 | 7.0% | 50% |
| Mimecast | 213 | 5.7% | 66% |
| OpenText (Zix / AppRiver) | 130 | 3.5% | 46% |
| Sophos | 33 | 0.9% | 52% |
| Cisco Secure Email | 24 | 0.6% | 75% |
Gateway customers enforce DMARC more often than credit unions that point MX straight at Microsoft 365 (56% vs 51%), but that gap is mostly size: gateways are more common at larger credit unions. Inside the single $100 million to $500 million band, 55% of gateway domains and 59% of Microsoft 365 direct domains enforce. A filtering service on inbound mail does nothing to stop someone spoofing the credit union’s own domain to members; only the domain’s DMARC policy does that. Credit unions on Google Workspace (15%) and on their own mail servers (21%) enforce least. 184 domains publish no MX record at all, and 11% of them have an enforcing DMARC record, although a domain that never sends mail can safely publish p=reject.
Credit union cybersecurity statistics by state
The map and table show the share of measured credit unions enforcing DMARC by mailing-address state. States with fewer than 10 measured credit unions are not shown, so that no single institution can be identified. Among the five states with the most credit unions, Texas sits at 42%, Pennsylvania at 29%, New York at 37%, California at 57% and Illinois at 38%.
| State | Credit unions | Measured domains | Any DMARC | DMARC enforced | p=reject | HTTPS redirect | HSTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 88 | 75 | 68% | 35% | 13% | 97% | 61% |
| Alaska | 8 | 8 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 |
| Arizona | 33 | 32 | 81% | 59% | 38% | 93% | 62% |
| Arkansas | 47 | 42 | 64% | 43% | 17% | 95% | 55% |
| California | 229 | 213 | 85% | 57% | 23% | 96% | 65% |
| Colorado | 62 | 56 | 84% | 50% | 18% | 96% | 53% |
| Connecticut | 64 | 55 | 75% | 42% | 20% | 92% | 65% |
| Delaware | 15 | 14 | 71% | 36% | 0% | 92% | 33% |
| District of Columbia | 28 | 21 | 81% | 29% | 19% | 89% | 53% |
| Florida | 107 | 102 | 87% | 64% | 23% | 99% | 64% |
| Georgia | 71 | 57 | 79% | 40% | 25% | 95% | 49% |
| Guam | 2 | 2 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 |
| Hawaii | 45 | 42 | 83% | 52% | 24% | 100% | 66% |
| Idaho | 20 | 19 | 89% | 58% | 16% | 100% | 53% |
| Illinois | 173 | 136 | 64% | 38% | 15% | 94% | 54% |
| Indiana | 113 | 100 | 80% | 42% | 15% | 95% | 46% |
| Iowa | 66 | 57 | 75% | 49% | 16% | 96% | 55% |
| Kansas | 62 | 51 | 73% | 45% | 25% | 100% | 61% |
| Kentucky | 51 | 45 | 87% | 36% | 7% | 98% | 68% |
| Louisiana | 136 | 100 | 66% | 42% | 10% | 90% | 57% |
| Maine | 48 | 47 | 98% | 57% | 34% | 95% | 61% |
| Maryland | 59 | 53 | 79% | 43% | 17% | 98% | 78% |
| Massachusetts | 121 | 111 | 75% | 47% | 14% | 93% | 54% |
| Michigan | 169 | 163 | 85% | 64% | 33% | 97% | 68% |
| Minnesota | 80 | 75 | 83% | 63% | 41% | 97% | 55% |
| Mississippi | 55 | 47 | 53% | 32% | 9% | 98% | 42% |
| Missouri | 87 | 77 | 70% | 44% | 21% | 96% | 45% |
| Montana | 40 | 35 | 77% | 46% | 9% | 94% | 37% |
| Nebraska | 50 | 46 | 74% | 41% | 22% | 95% | 55% |
| Nevada | 8 | 8 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 |
| New Hampshire | 12 | 12 | 92% | 42% | 33% | 100% | 55% |
| New Jersey | 126 | 95 | 66% | 27% | 8% | 95% | 38% |
| New Mexico | 37 | 36 | 81% | 53% | 25% | 97% | 54% |
| New York | 268 | 232 | 73% | 37% | 11% | 95% | 46% |
| North Carolina | 57 | 54 | 89% | 63% | 22% | 100% | 54% |
| North Dakota | 29 | 26 | 81% | 54% | 12% | 83% | 48% |
| Ohio | 157 | 144 | 74% | 38% | 16% | 96% | 46% |
| Oklahoma | 52 | 50 | 78% | 44% | 22% | 96% | 54% |
| Oregon | 47 | 45 | 93% | 58% | 16% | 95% | 61% |
| Pennsylvania | 269 | 237 | 67% | 29% | 13% | 95% | 36% |
| Puerto Rico | 4 | 4 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 |
| Rhode Island | 14 | 12 | 83% | 58% | 33% | n<10 | n<10 |
| South Carolina | 45 | 41 | 85% | 61% | 27% | 95% | 52% |
| South Dakota | 33 | 32 | 84% | 41% | 19% | 97% | 48% |
| Tennessee | 125 | 111 | 77% | 45% | 18% | 91% | 54% |
| Texas | 376 | 334 | 71% | 42% | 19% | 97% | 54% |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 5 | 5 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 | n<10 |
| Utah | 51 | 42 | 79% | 45% | 26% | 94% | 49% |
| Vermont | 12 | 11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 100% | 36% |
| Virginia | 95 | 80 | 82% | 49% | 18% | 100% | 66% |
| Washington | 73 | 73 | 86% | 58% | 26% | 100% | 59% |
| West Virginia | 74 | 56 | 59% | 43% | 23% | 96% | 50% |
| Wisconsin | 98 | 92 | 76% | 45% | 23% | 96% | 52% |
| Wyoming | 18 | 17 | 82% | 59% | 24% | 100% | 69% |
HTTPS and HSTS cells need at least 10 homepages measured in the state. “n<10” marks a suppressed cell.
Website transport security: HTTPS, TLS 1.3 and HSTS
On November 11, 2026, for each credit union website, we made one homepage request starting at the plain http:// address and followed redirects that stayed on the credit union’s own domain. That single request shows whether the site moves visitors to HTTPS, which TLS version the server negotiates with a current client, and whether it sends a Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header telling browsers never to use plain HTTP again (RFC 6797).
95.7% of the 3,503 homepages we reached send HTTP visitors to HTTPS. Of the sites where we saw the TLS handshake, 94% negotiated TLS 1.3 and 6% TLS 1.2. 54% send an HSTS header, 38% with a lifetime of at least one year, and 15.8% include the preload flag. 15 sites presented a certificate our client could not validate, and 90 still serve their homepage over plain HTTP with no redirect, 65 of them at credit unions under $50 million in assets. HSTS is the clearest size gap on the web side: 36% of credit unions under $10 million send the header, against 62% between $100 million and $500 million and 77% from $1 billion to $10 billion.
What NCUA requires, and what it has counted
NCUA does not require DMARC. What it does require, since September 1, 2023, is fast notice of incidents. The rule, 12 CFR 748.1(c), reads:
“Each federally insured credit union must notify the appropriate NCUA-designated point of contact of the occurrence of a reportable cyber incident via email, telephone, or other similar methods that the NCUA may prescribe. The NCUA must receive this notification as soon as possible but no later than 72 hours after a federally insured credit union reasonably believes that it has experienced a reportable cyber incident or, if reporting pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) of this section, within 72 hours of being notified by a third-party, whichever is sooner.”
Paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C) covers incidents “caused by, a compromise of a credit union service organization, cloud service provider, or other third-party data hosting provider or by a supply chain compromise.” NCUA has published three counts from the reports it received:
| Period | Cyber incidents reported | Third-party share | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sept 1, 2023 to May 1, 2024 | 892 | About 73% | NCUA report to Congress, 2024 |
| Sept 1, 2023 to Aug 31, 2024 | 1,072 | 742 (nearly 7 in 10) | NCUA Board briefing, October 2024 |
| May 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 | 539 | Not stated | NCUA 2025 resilience report |
The periods overlap; do not add them. NCUA says no incident reported from May 2024 to April 2025 was systemic to the credit union system.
On email specifically, NCUA’s Risk Alert 21-RISK-01 (October 2021), on business email compromise through cloud email services, told boards and chief executives to “implement email authentication technologies such as Domain-based Message Authentication Reporting and Conformance (DMARC) policies to prevent spoofing and validate incoming email.” Five years later, 2,040 of 3,730 measured credit unions (55%) have no enforcing policy. The incident rule is about reporting quickly; how long organizations in other sectors take to disclose breaches is tracked in our breach notification timing study.
Breach notices filed by credit unions
State attorney general lists show only breaches that a credit union itself reported to residents of that state, so they are a floor, not a census. We used the California list (back to 2012) and the Washington list (back to 2015), and not Maine’s list, which returned no records when we requested it on November 11, 2026. We counted notices from organizations whose name contains “credit union” or “FCU” and publish only the counts.
| Year notice posted | California: credit union notices | California: all notices | Washington: credit union notices | Washington: all notices |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 252 | 0 | 60 |
| 2020 | 3 | 390 | 2 | 204 |
| 2021 | 1 | 479 | 1 | 186 |
| 2022 | 6 | 455 | 5 | 171 |
| 2023 | 14 | 642 | 4 | 252 |
| 2024 | 15 | 608 | 4 | 228 |
| 2025 | 9 | 565 | 2 | 209 |
| 2026* | 9 | 516 | 1 | 177 |
*2026 runs to November 9, 2026 (California) and November 9, 2026 (Washington). Washington lists only breaches affecting more than 500 Washington residents.
California’s list holds 74 credit union notices since 2012, 47 of them from January 2023 on, against 13 in the four years from 2019 to 2022. Washington’s 20 credit union notices name ransomware as the cause in 7 and payment-card skimmers in 4. For every sector together, see our 2026 data breach statistics.
Check your own credit union’s domain
Every check in this report uses public records anyone can query. Replace example.org with the domain:
dig +short TXT _dmarc.example.org # DMARC: look for p=quarantine or p=reject dig +short TXT example.org | grep spf1 # SPF: ends in -all (hard fail) or ~all (soft fail) dig +short MX example.org # who receives the mail dig +short DS example.org # any output means DNSSEC is signed at the registry curl -sI http://www.example.org/ | grep -i location # should point to https:// curl -sI https://www.example.org/ | grep -i strict-transport # HSTS header
On Windows, nslookup -type=txt _dmarc.example.org does the same as the first line. A credit union is in the enforcing group of this report if the first command returns a record containing p=quarantine or p=reject. Compare your result with your asset band in the ladder table above, and see DMARC adoption across other sectors.
What this means for MSPs and credit union IT teams
For an MSP serving credit unions under $100 million in assets, the gap is concrete: 29% of $10 million to $50 million credit unions and 38% of $50 million to $100 million credit unions enforce DMARC, and many publish p=none and stop there. Moving a domain from p=none to p=reject means listing every service that sends as the domain (core banking notices, e-statements, marketing platforms, loan origination systems), getting each aligned through SPF or DKIM, reading the rua reports for a few weeks, then stepping to quarantine and reject. Domains used only for websites, and the 184 measured domains with no MX, can go straight to v=DMARC1; p=reject. Because the 72-hour clock in 748.1(c) also runs when a vendor tells the credit union about a third-party compromise, contracts should require vendors to notify the credit union quickly enough to meet it.
Frequently asked questions
Are credit unions safe from cyber attacks?
Credit unions are attacked constantly but rarely in ways that threaten the whole system. Under NCUA’s 72-hour rule, credit unions reported 1,072 cyber incidents from September 1, 2023 to August 31, 2024, and NCUA says none of the 539 incidents reported from May 2024 to April 2025 was systemic. Basic email defenses are uneven: 55% of the 3,730 credit union domains we measured do not enforce DMARC.
How many cyber incidents do credit unions report to the NCUA?
NCUA has published three counts: 892 incidents from September 1, 2023 to May 1, 2024 (about 73% involving a third party), 1,072 from September 1, 2023 to August 31, 2024 (742 tied to a third-party vendor), and 539 from May 1, 2024 to April 30, 2025. The periods overlap, so the figures should not be added together.
Do credit unions have to report cyber incidents?
Yes. Since September 1, 2023, 12 CFR 748.1(c) requires every federally insured credit union to notify NCUA no later than 72 hours after it reasonably believes a reportable cyber incident occurred, or within 72 hours of being notified by a third party such as a credit union service organization or cloud provider.
Have any credit unions been hacked?
Yes. Organizations with credit union in their name filed 74 breach notices with the California Attorney General from 2012 to November 9, 2026, 47 of them since January 2023, and 20 with the Washington Attorney General, 7 of which cite ransomware. These are notices filed by credit unions themselves; incidents at their vendors are often filed under the vendor’s name.
Is DMARC really necessary for a credit union?
NCUA’s Risk Alert 21-RISK-01 (October 2021) told credit unions to implement DMARC policies to prevent spoofing. Only a quarantine or reject policy tells receiving mail servers to stop mail that fakes the domain. 45% of measured credit unions have one; 31% publish p=none, which only monitors.
How many credit unions use Microsoft 365?
1,669 of 3,730 measured credit union domains (45%) point their MX records straight at Microsoft 365. Another 606 route mail through a security gateway and list Microsoft 365 in SPF, which suggests Microsoft mailboxes behind the gateway: 2,275 domains, or 61%, in total.
Free to cite and republish with a link to this page. The CSV holds aggregates only (all credit unions, asset bands, member bands, charter type, mail route, states with at least 10 measured credit unions); it contains no per-credit-union results.
Methodology
Frame. NCUA’s list of 4,214 federally insured credit unions for June 30, 2026 (charter number, mailing-address state, members, total assets, charter type), joined by charter number to the website address each credit union reports in the Profile section of its 5300 Call Report for the same quarter (file FS220D, account 891, “If your credit union has a World Wide Website address, please provide it”). 3,772 credit unions reported a usable address; 442 reported none or one we could not read. The field holds 35 characters, so longer addresses are cut off; we completed 49 by checking which single .com, .org, .net or .coop ending exists in DNS and dropped 34 that could not be completed. Domains shared by several credit unions or hosted on a shared platform (for example a website builder or a vendor’s subdomain) were excluded, leaving 3,746 domains. 13 of those no longer exist in DNS. The measured base is 3,730 credit unions holding 99.6% of the 146.1 million members of federally insured credit unions.
Cross-check. An independent DNS census of credit union websites published by Provena on October 7, 2026 found 46% enforcing DMARC and 19% at p=reject, 30% enforcing under $100 million in assets and 46% of mail-receiving domains on Microsoft 365 directly. Our figures for the same measures are 45%, 19%, 29% and 47%.
DNS checks (November 11, 2026). For each domain: MX, the apex TXT records (SPF), the TXT record at _dmarc (DMARC) and DS (DNSSEC), queried through Google Public DNS and Cloudflare DNS-over-HTTPS with at most five lookups in flight per resolver. DMARC enforced means a single valid record with p=quarantine or p=reject. SPF is graded by the final all mechanism. Mail providers are classified from the lowest-preference MX host; “behind a gateway” Microsoft 365 is inferred from an SPF include of spf.protection.outlook.com.
Web check (November 11, 2026). One request for robots.txt, then one homepage request per website host starting at http://, following redirects hop by hop while they stay on the same registrable domain, at most two requests per second in total, with the user agent “UptimeReportResearch/1.0 (+https://theuptimereport.com/about/)”. Only response headers were kept. 169 hosts whose robots.txt disallowed us were skipped and 74 did not answer. No ports were scanned, and no logins, forms or other pages were touched.
Limitations. We measure the website domain a credit union reports to NCUA. Some credit unions send member email from a different domain, which this census does not see, and DKIM keys (RFC 6376) cannot be listed from DNS without knowing their selectors, so DKIM is not reported. DMARC tells receivers what to do; it does not prove every receiver does it. Breach-notice counts depend on name matching and include only notices filed under a credit union’s own name. Weaknesses are reported only in aggregate: this page and its CSV name no credit union.
Licences. NCUA data, eCFR text and state attorney general lists are US government works or public records. Our aggregate CSV is CC BY 4.0.
Not advice. This is a measurement of public records, not a security assessment of any institution.
Cite as: The Uptime Report. “Credit Union Cybersecurity Statistics 2026: 55% of Credit Unions Do Not Enforce DMARC, Five Years After NCUA Urged It.” November 2026. https://theuptimereport.com/credit-union-cybersecurity-statistics/
References
- NCUA, 5300 Call Report Quarterly Data, June 2026 (call-report-data-2026-06.zip). Accessed November 2026.
- NCUA, Federally Insured Credit Union List, June 2026. Accessed November 2026.
- eCFR, 12 CFR 748.1, Filing of reports. Accessed November 2026.
- eCFR, 12 CFR 740.5, Requirements for the official advertising statement. Accessed November 2026.
- NCUA, Board Approves Final Rule on Cyber Incident Reporting Requirements (effective September 1, 2023). Accessed November 2026.
- NCUA, Cybersecurity and Credit Union System Resilience Annual Report to Congress (2024). Accessed November 2026.
- NCUA, Board Briefed on Cybersecurity, New Charters, and Field of Membership (October 2024). Accessed November 2026.
- NCUA, 2025 Cybersecurity and Credit Union System Resilience Report. Accessed November 2026.
- NCUA, Risk Alert 21-RISK-01, Business Email Compromise through Exploitation of Cloud-Based Email Services (October 2021). Accessed November 2026.
- California Attorney General, Data Security Breach Reports (CSV export). Accessed November 2026.
- Washington Attorney General, Data Breach Notifications Affecting Washington Residents (data.wa.gov). Accessed November 2026.
- Provena, US Bank and Credit Union Email Census: 7,537 Domains (October 2026), used as a cross-check only. Accessed November 2026.
- IETF RFC 7489, DMARC and RFC 6797, HSTS. Accessed November 2026.
Research library
More original data reports from The Uptime Report. Every report includes its methodology and a free CSV download. Browse all research
Threats and breaches
- AT&T Data Breach Settlement Payout Date
AT&T payout status, tiers, incident history - Microsoft Data Breach History
Microsoft incidents by type, 2020 to 2026 - IC3 Report 2025
IC3 losses, crime types, states per capita - AI Incidents Statistics 2026
AI incidents by year, harm type, company - Cyber Attacks 2026
Every 2026 cyber attack, primary-sourced - WordPress Vulnerabilities
WordPress plugin, theme and core CVEs - Hypervisor Vulnerabilities
Hypervisor CVEs vs exploitation - DMARC Adoption Statistics 2026
DMARC enforcement, 15,000 domains - RMM Vulnerabilities and Remote Access Flaws
RMM and remote access flaws in KEV - Identity Theft Statistics 2026
ID theft per 100K by state and type - Scam Statistics 2026
FTC fraud losses by channel and age - VPN Vulnerabilities by Vendor
VPN gateway KEV and CVEs by vendor - MFA Statistics 2026
MFA methods across 2,571 services - Password Statistics 2026
12,674 passwords tested against HIBP - Ransomware Groups 2026
Most active ransomware groups, ranked - Ransomware Statistics 2026
Leak-site victims by month since 2021 - Malicious npm Packages
Malicious npm packages, day by day - Cybersecurity Statistics 2026
70 sourced stats, every number traced - Zero-Day Statistics
Every tracked zero-day since 2014 - Phishing Statistics 2026
Four phishing measures, one evidence board - Patch Tuesday Statistics 2026
Every Microsoft CVE since 2021 - Disaster Declarations by State
FEMA data for continuity planning - Data Breach Statistics 2026
980 breaches in Have I Been Pwned - Ransomware Initial Access Vectors
CISA advisories coded by entry technique - CVE Statistics 2026
Vulnerabilities published per year, NIST NVD - How Long Do Companies Take to Report a Data Breach?
1,675 Washington notices - Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
The CISA KEV catalog analyzed - Healthcare Data Breach Report 2026
HHS OCR breach portal scorecard - Ransomware Reported to the FBI
Five-year IC3 trend - ConnectWise ScreenConnect Vulnerabilities
ScreenConnect CVEs dated, with version lookup - SonicWall Vulnerabilities 2026
SonicWall CVEs by product line and KEV year - Dental Practice Data Breaches 2026
Every 2026 dental breach on the HHS portal - Apple Zero Days 2026 List
Every Apple-flagged CVE, with KEV dates - Android Zero Days 2026
Android flags by layer, OEM patch lag - Auto Dealership Data Breach 2026 Tracker
Dealer and vendor breaches by state filing - Law Firm Data Breaches 2026
Every law firm AG notice, sized and dated - Accounting Firm Data Breach 2026
CPA breach notices against the tax calendar - Bank DMARC Adoption 2026
DMARC at 4,118 US banks, by size - MSP Email Security
MSP DMARC and SPF, 1,430 domains - Citrix NetScaler Vulnerabilities 2026
48 NetScaler CVEs, 6 exploited, build checker - Fortinet Vulnerabilities 2026
Every 2026 Fortinet CVE, by product - Okta Vulnerabilities
Okta CVEs and incidents, two ledgers - Veeam Vulnerabilities
Veeam CVEs, fixed builds, KEV flags - Atlassian Confluence Vulnerabilities
Confluence CVEs, KEV and LTS fixes - SolarWinds Vulnerabilities
338 SolarWinds CVEs, 11 exploited in KEV - SAP NetWeaver Vulnerabilities
Every SAP NetWeaver CVE, by Patch Day - N-able Vulnerabilities
N-able CVEs, fixed builds and KEV flags
Infrastructure and uptime
- Data Centers Using Nuclear Power
Every US nuclear deal, by NRC stage - Claude Outage History
934 Claude incidents by model and hour - AMD vs Nvidia Market Share Over Time
AMD vs Nvidia share: Steam and SEC filings - iPhone Market Share by Country 2026
iPhone share in every country - Android Market Share by Version 2026
Android versions and patch status - OpenAI Outage History
1,051 OpenAI incidents, causes coded - Data Center Construction Spending 2026
Data center build spending, Census monthly - Microsoft End of Support 2026
Every 2026 Microsoft support cutoff - Fiber Internet Availability by State 2026
Fiber by state, build pace, top providers - 5G Coverage Map 2026
5G by state and carrier, FCC data - Cell Phone Outage History
FCC outages, DIRS cell sites, 911 fines - Mac Market Share 2026
Mac desktop share by country and version - Browser Market Share 2026
Browser share since 2009, by platform - Microsoft 365 Market Share 2026
Who runs email: Microsoft vs Google - CrowdStrike Outage
July 19, 2024 outage, minute by minute - Data Center Electricity Prices 2026
Power prices vs data center load, by state - Average Internet Bill 2026
Home internet prices by speed and state - Search Engine Market Share 2026
Search share since 2009, by country - ChatGPT Market Share 2026
AI chatbot referral share, every tracker - Google Cloud Outage History
Google Cloud incidents by product, 2013 on - Azure Outage History
Every Azure PIR, coded by root cause - Data Center Water Usage 2026
Water by site, company and drought - AI Energy Consumption 2026
Big Tech electricity vs US demand - SSD Prices 2026
NAND price cycle from makers’ filings - RAM Prices 2026
DRAM prices from producers’ filings - Domain Name Statistics 2026
Domains by TLD, renewals, registrars - Linux Market Share 2026
Linux desktop share, every headline traced - GitHub Outages
GitHub incidents by month since 2020 - Cloudflare Outage History
Every Cloudflare outage post-mortem - Starlink Statistics 2026
Satellites, subscribers, coverage, outages - Internet Access Statistics 2026
Home internet gaps by state and group - SQL Server End of Life
SQL Server support countdown + CVEs - Windows 11 Market Share 2026
Windows 10 vs 11 share by country - Cloud Computing Statistics 2026
Hyperscaler revenue and capex, SEC data - AWS Outage History
Every AWS Post-Event Summary since 2011 - Data Centers by State 2026
Sites, jobs, power for every state - Data Center Statistics 2026
Data center power, spending, jobs - 99.9% Uptime
Uptime calculator and 35 real SLAs - Power Outage Statistics by State
Outage hours by state, EIA data - Cost of Downtime
Revenue per hour for 3,001 public companies - Windows Server End of Life
Support dates and CVEs per server version - SQL Server 2016 ESU Cost
ESU cost calculator, every formula - Slack Outage History
1,459 Slack entries, SLA history, ledger - Google Workspace vs Microsoft 365 in US Schools
Google vs Microsoft in 10,591 districts - Block GPTBot
AI crawler blocks across top 10k sites - security.txt Adoption 2026
Who publishes a valid security.txt - Government Email Security 2026
.gov DMARC: local 40% vs federal 88% - Government Website Security 2026
.gov web security scored by state - vSphere 8 End of Support
vSphere 8 dates, exploited flaws by version - Office 2019 End of Life
Office 2019 EOL: who still gets patches - Zoom Outage History
Every Zoom incident since 2015 - Office 2021 End of Life
177 flaws fixed a month after support ended - Exchange Server 2019 End of Life
Exchange 2019 EOL, ESU builds and CVEs - FortiOS 7.0 End of Life
FortiOS 7.0 dates, builds and unfixed flaws
Regulation and disclosure
- Are Ransomware Payments Illegal? Law by Jurisdiction
Who may pay a ransom, by jurisdiction - HIPAA Security Rule Changes 2026
Security Rule status: current vs proposed - FTC Safeguards Rule Breach Notification
500-consumer, 30-day FTC breach duty - Data Center Moratorium by State 2026
Moratoria and bans in every state - State Privacy Laws 2026
23 state privacy laws, compared - State AI Laws 2026
131 state AI laws, dates and penalties - FedRAMP Statistics 2026
FedRAMP authorizations, GSA data - Item 1C Cybersecurity Disclosures
What 600 10-Ks say in Item 1C - CMMC Certification Statistics 2026
CMMC demand vs assessor capacity - Data Brokers List 2026
728 brokers across three state registries - SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosures
Every 8-K Item 1.05 filing - HIPAA Enforcement Tracker
Every OCR penalty and settlement - CMMC Level 2 Assessment Cost
CMMC Level 2 cost estimator, DoD figures - Safe Harbor Cybersecurity Laws by State
10 states, 11 laws, framework grid
Workforce and pay
- Intel Layoff Tracker
Every Intel WARN notice, by site and date - Amazon Layoffs by State
Amazon WARN notices, state by state - Oracle Layoffs by State
Oracle WARN notices and restructuring cost - Cloud Architect vs Cloud Engineer Salary
Architect vs engineer pay, H-1B filings - Entry Level DevOps Engineer Salary
Entry level DevOps pay, H-1B filings - Microsoft Layoff History Timeline
Every round dated, 2009 to 2026 - Google Layoffs by Year
Notices, headcount, severance by year - AI Engineer vs ML Engineer Salary
AI vs ML engineer pay, from H-1B filings - Data Engineer Salary by Experience
Data engineer pay by DOL wage level - Most Popular Programming Languages 2026
Language ranks by country, GitHub data - Computer Science Graduates Per Year
CS degrees per year, IPEDS 2011 to 2024 - Data Scientist Salary 2026
Data scientist pay ladder and metros, BLS - Web Developer Salary 2026
Web dev vs software pay by state, BLS - AI at Work Statistics 2026
Worker AI use: ever, weekly, daily, by job - Network Engineer Salary 2026
Network engineer vs admin pay, BLS - IT Manager Salary 2026
IT manager pay by industry, BLS OEWS - Software Engineer Salary 2026
Developer pay by metro, BLS OEWS - H-1B Statistics 2026
H-1B lottery, employers, and wages - AI Layoffs 2026
AI-blamed job cuts, sourced to filings - Help Desk Salary 2026
Help desk hourly pay, BLS OEWS - Cybersecurity Salary 2026
Security pay percentiles, BLS OEWS - Women in Tech Statistics 2026
Women’s share of tech jobs since 2011 - IT Unemployment Rate 2026
Tech vs national jobless rate, monthly - Tech Job Postings 2026
Tech postings vs 2020, by role and country - Tech Layoffs 2026
Tech layoffs from state WARN notices - Remote Work Statistics 2026
Telework by job, industry, and state - Highest Paying Cities for IT Jobs 2026
Metro pay by role, BLS OEWS - The Tech Job Market in 2026
Openings, quits, hires, layoffs - IT Salaries by State 2026
Pay matrix for four IT roles - IT and Cybersecurity Jobs Outlook 2026
BLS employment projections - Salesforce Layoffs by State
Salesforce WARN notices, state by state - Dell Layoffs by Year
Headcount, severance, notices by year - IBM Layoffs by Year
IBM workforce charges against headcount - Meta Layoffs by Year
Meta rounds, sites and headcount by year - IT Director vs IT Manager Salary
IT director vs manager pay, H-1B filings - Penetration Tester Salary Entry Level
Entry level pen test pay, H-1B filings - Site Reliability Engineer vs DevOps Salary
SRE vs DevOps pay, H-1B filings - Solutions Architect vs Software Engineer Salary
Architect vs engineer pay, Level I to IV - Data Engineer vs Data Analyst Salary
Data engineer vs analyst pay, H-1B ledger - Network Engineer vs System Administrator Salary
Network engineer vs sysadmin pay by state - Security Analyst vs Security Engineer Salary
Analyst vs engineer pay, step by step - Cloud Engineer vs DevOps Engineer Salary
Cloud vs DevOps pay by metro, H-1B - Cisco Layoffs by Year
Cisco cuts by year: charges vs staff - Database Administrator vs Data Engineer Salary
DBA vs data engineer pay, reconciled - Penetration Tester vs Security Engineer Salary
Pen tester vs engineer pay: near tie - Help Desk vs Desktop Support Salary
Help desk vs desktop pay, one BLS code
MSP market and spending
- AI Capex 2026
Big Tech capex vs cash flow, SEC data - Cybersecurity Budget 2027
Federal and CISA cyber budgets, benchmarks - Microsoft 365 Price Increase 2026
Every M365 price change, vs inflation - Computer Prices 2026
Computer price indexes and HS 8471 imports - MSP Market Size 2026
Managed services market, built from Census - Small Business AI Adoption 2026
AI use by firm size, sector, state, Census - Cyber Insurance Statistics
Cyber insurance market, NAIC 2015-2024 - IT Spending by Industry
IT investment by industry, BEA - IT Services Industry Growth 2026
Census revenue by service industry - IT Hourly Rates 2026
Hourly IT labor rates, GSA contracts - VoIP Statistics 2026
Business VoIP vs landlines, FCC - MSP Industry Statistics 2026
Jobs, wages, and firms, BLS QCEW - Federal IT Spending 2026
IT services contracts, USAspending - IT Services Firms by State
Census business patterns atlas - How Much Do MSPs Charge Per User?
Published MSP prices, 1,310 websites - VMware Price Increase Broadcom Timeline
Broadcom VMware changes and revenue, dated - Adobe Price Increase History
Every Adobe price change, vs inflation - Atlassian Price Increase History, 2019 to 2026
Every Atlassian price hike, dated - Zoom Price Increase 2026
Every Zoom price change since 2013
Leave a Reply